vendor lock-in → exit plan
Get an exact quote
IaC & Secrets migration path

From Chef (Progress) to Pulumi

Cost comparison, a phase-by-phase migration plan, and the automation to execute it.

Effort
Medium
Est. timeline
~15 wks
Pulumi model
Free OSS / paid
Open source
Yes
▶ Model your savings in the calculator

3-year cost calculator

Pre-filled for Chef (Progress) → Pulumi. Adjust every figure with your own numbers.

Every figure here is an illustrative estimate, not a vendor quote. Defaults are editable starting points compiled from public information; real, binding pricing comes from the vendor or an authorized distributor. See our methodology.

Sized at 3,000 managed resources — cost is computed on this.
Stay on Chef (Progress) (3yr)
$198,000
Move to Pulumi (3yr + migration)
$132,000
Projected savings
$66,000 (33%)
Payback period
17.1 mo
Build a decision report from these numbers:

All figures are illustrative and fully editable — adjust the cost-per-resource and migration inputs with your own numbers. Not guaranteed vendor pricing (defaults reviewed May 2026). For a binding quote, use the request form below to reach an authorized distributor or partner.

Quick comparison: Chef (Progress) vs Pulumi

Common trade-offs teams weigh when staying on Chef (Progress) versus moving to Pulumi. These are general, commonly-reported considerations — not statements of fact about any vendor — so check them against your own contract and the vendors' current terms.

Chef (Progress) Current
Progress · Per-node subscription
  • Already in production — no migration effort or risk
  • Mature ecosystem with vendor support and SLAs
  • Per-node licensing across the fleet
  • Premium support and renewals
  • Migration off legacy cookbooks
  • Ongoing per-node subscription cost to budget for
Pulumi Planned
Open source · Free OSS / paid
  • Open source — no license fees
  • No vendor lock-in
  • Cost model: Free OSS / paid
  • Requires a migration (~15 weeks, medium effort)
  • Community support by default — paid support optional

Why teams evaluate alternatives to Chef (Progress)

Reasons commonly cited by users and in public industry coverage for re-evaluating Chef (Progress). These are general, reported considerations — not statements of fact about Progress — and may not reflect your situation or the vendor's current terms. Verify against your own contract before deciding.

  • Per-node licensing across the fleet
  • Premium support and renewals
  • Migration off legacy cookbooks

The migration plan

Roughly 15 weeks for a mid-size estate, in six phases.

Assessment & discovery
Inventory every workload, dependency, and integration; flag anything high-risk.
Target design & sizing
Size the new platform, design storage and networking, set RPO/RTO and rollback criteria.
Pilot migration
Migrate a small low-risk set end-to-end and validate the runbook.
↳ Adopt the open fork or alternative, migrate state/secrets via the compatible backend, repoint clients and CI/CD, and diff plans/auth before cutover.
Production migration
Move workloads in scheduled waves using automation; verify after each wave.
Validation & optimization
Tune performance, confirm backup/DR, and update monitoring and docs.
Decommission source
Reclaim licenses, retire old infrastructure, and capture lessons learned.

Tooling & automation

Adopt the open fork or alternative, migrate state/secrets via the compatible backend, repoint clients and CI/CD, and diff plans/auth before cutover.

OffVendor's wizard pre-fills these scripts with your environment — inventory export, disk/schema conversion, bulk provisioning, and validation.

Frequently asked

Is migrating from Chef (Progress) to Pulumi worth it?

For most teams facing rising Chef (Progress) costs, yes — Pulumi (free oss / paid) typically lowers 3-year total cost of ownership, though the right answer depends on workload complexity and in-house skills. Use the calculator to model your own numbers.

How long does a Chef (Progress) to Pulumi migration take?

A typical mid-size estimate is around 15 weeks across six phases — discovery, design, pilot, waved production migration, validation, and decommission. Larger or more complex estates take longer.

What tools are used to migrate from Chef (Progress) to Pulumi?

Adopt the open fork or alternative, migrate state/secrets via the compatible backend, repoint clients and CI/CD, and diff plans/auth before cutover.

Get a vendor-accurate Pulumi quote

A guided builder that turns your estimates into a requirements report you can send to a vendor, partner, or distributor to secure a binding quote.

How this works — and what's yours to provide
  • Your inputs, your responsibility. The figures and estimates here describe your environment and requirements — please make sure they're accurate. OffVendor's defaults are illustrative starting points only, not vendor pricing.
  • It generates a requirements report (RFQ). Use it to capture your sizing and requirements and share it with your authorized vendor / partner / distributor to obtain a final, binding quote.
  • Then close the loop on your TCO. When the real quote comes back, plug those actual prices into the calculator above to refine your TCO and see where reality differs from the estimate.
  1. 1Size it
  2. 2Requirements
  3. 3Your details
  4. 4Channels & export

How big is your Chef (Progress) estate?

Approximate count of IaC-managed resources / secrets clients. Not sure? Enter rough numbers — the distributor confirms exact counts later.

3,000 managed resources
Default mid-size assumption (3,000 managed resources)
Estimates are illustrative and configurable; production figures come from vendor list prices and your own quotes.